Could you give me an example on how to effectively approach this article in reference to questions 2,3, and 4 I have tried hard to develop a thesis statement but could not come up with one that could give me at least four things to argument on. Thank you very much. My article is below…
WE WRITE PAPERS FOR STUDENTS
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project.
Get Help Now!In an essay of five paragraphs
Identify the title of the article, its author and the source from which it come;
State clearly the authors position along with elaboration and explanation;
Defend your position clearly and thoroughly with appropriate facts, and/or examples, along with sound logics;
Conclude with out being in any way repetitive; in other words do not summarize.
Could you give me an example on how to effectively approach this article in reference to questions 2,3, and 4 I have tried hard to develop a thesis statement but could not come up with one that could give me at least four things to argument on. Thank you very much. My article is attached.
In an essay of five paragraphs
Identify the title of the article, its author and the source from which it come;
State clearly the authors position along with elaboration and explanation;
Defend your position clearly and thoroughly with appropriate facts, and/or examples, along with sound logics;
Conclude with out being in any way repetitive; in other words do not summarize.
The New Crop
Millions of college graduates are joining the American workforce this month–and what they want and expect from work isn’t the same as it was for their older siblings. Employers and generational experts discuss what this latest generation is looking for in its jobs and careers.
By Douglas Wolk
his month, millions of American college students are graduating and joining the workforce. They’re very different from graduates 10 years ago, significantly different from even last year’s graduates–and a little baffled by the state of the job market that awaits them.
“This generation is somewhat ill-defined, the workplace is ill-defined–it’s a perfect match,” jokes Bob Rosner, who writes the syndicated column “Working Wounded.”
Experience Inc., which sells recruiting software to colleges, has been surveying the past few years’ worth of graduating classes. Vice president of marketing Janet Sun says that what drives students’ career decisions varies from year to year.
Last year, their three most important criteria were salary, career advancement and location, Sun notes. But “it’s not always about salary,” she says, “and it’s not always about location.” Location, in fact, dropped significantly this year, from third place to 10th.
The most important criteria now are a job that fits with their skills, professional development opportunity, and company reputation and ethics.
The job market influences students’ choices, allowing more room to be picky. About 25 percent of students had received job offers when Experience conducted its survey in March; last year, it was about 18 percent.
Amy Van Kirk, who handles campus recruiting for PricewaterhouseCoopers, sees professional development as a key criterion. “Students these days want to take advantage of coaching opportunities, they want to be mentored, they want to learn,” she says. “They’re very eager to have a lot of hands-on exposure, to form relationships at PwC and with clients. They also expect a lot of ongoing development and on-the-job guidance. They want to make sure they’re joining a company with the best technology, the best databases, the best access to information, and that there’s enough structured training, not only when they start, but continuing throughout their career.”
Sun has been telling recruiters that if their companies have formal learning plans in place, they should play that up to job candidates. “A lot of insurance companies who are hiring for very specialized positions, such as actuaries, have that sort of intense training process,” she says. “They want to bring people on very early on. They’re extremely careful about who they hire, and they don’t want to lose these people because they’re highly skilled. There’s a very defined path, and your progress is very measurable.”
Sun mentions Accenture and Vector Marketing as other companies that offer attractive professional development programs.
She also singles out Enterprise Rent-A-Car for its approach to hiring and training graduates. “They have an amazing program, training people in a lot of different roles,” she says. “They bring in people they want to hold on to, and they grow them. That’s completely unusual in their business–they don’t hire college graduates or keep them on the front line at Avis or Hertz.”
Marie Artim, Enterprise’s assistant vice president of recruiting, explains: “The core philosophies of our business are behind (our recruiting message). We promote entirely from within, so anyone who comes in and looks at the entry-level career opportunities with our company can see that there’s a lot of potential to build a career within the organization. We offer continual training, development, marketing and business skills.”
West Michigan furniture company Herman Miller offers 100 percent reimbursement for continuing education, says Jack Schreur, director of employee and communications services. “You make it a part of your development plan and show how it relates to either your position now or a reasonably attainable position, and we’ll pay for it,” he says. “If you’re really serious about hiring talented young people, you have to make sure the folks who come to you understand explicitly that there’s not just the possibility for them to grow their talents through further education and training in the field, but there’s that expectation. If you come in with the experience you’ve got and you leave with that same experience, you’ve failed as an employee and we’ve failed as an employer.”
“Heads should roll”
The No. 3-ranked criterion in the Experience poll is company reputation and ethics, which new graduates have seen discussed extensively on the news. A recent Harris Interactive poll found that far fewer employees of large companies than small companies feel that top management “displays integrity or morality” or “is committed to advancing the skills of employees.”
Eric Chester, who has written a book about young employees, says, “If young people see older employees being casually discarded, they know that it will be just a matter of time before the same happens to them.”
RainmakerThinking’s Bruce Tulgan, author of Managing Generation X, argues that the problem is actually something that tends to happen at larger companies: Managers don’t spend nearly as much time working with their direct reports as they do at smaller companies. This makes the bureaucracy more faceless and even threatening to employees.
Eric Chester, author of Getting Them to Give a Damn and founder and CEO of Generation Why, suggests that companies should survey employees to see if they feel disconnected or disenfranchised. “By the very nature of their size, big companies tend not to communicate as in-depth with their front lines as smaller companies do, leaving front-line talent at larger companies to feel lost in the shuffle. However, leading organizations, regardless of size, always know what their front line is thinking. … (If employees) leave because they feel that management is not demonstrating integrity and morality, heads should roll.”
Ethics and integrity are connected to another word that’s important to new graduates: meaning. About 8.8 million people ages 16 to 24 do volunteer work, according to a September 2004 study by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s up from about 7.7 million two years ago. Many of them are looking for work that has some kind of significance in their community or in the world. Experience’s Sun notes that although the most popular fields among new graduates are still financial services, accounting, engineering and computers, many students are interested in education, government work and nonprofits.
A lot of businesses are in the middle: They may not have tons of high-paid engineering jobs, but they’re also not overtly altruistic. They need to appeal to young employees looking for meaning in what they do. “The simple solution is to make the boring work meaningful,” Generation Why’s Chester says. “Make certain to connect those who are doing mundane tasks to the bigger picture, so that they can clearly see and are made to feel that they are not just entering data or putting Part A into Part B. They are a key part of saving lives, building energy-efficient housing or helping people increase their net worth.”
That’s essentially what Herman Miller does to create meaning from making furniture. “We don’t think we can differentiate ourselves by being the highest-paying employer; we differentiate ourselves on the idea of the employee experience,” Schreur says. “Central to that is that we want people to come to work at Herman Miller because they get a sense of meaning here. We talk about it very explicitly: We say, ‘Making office furniture doesn’t provide meaning.’ Creating great places to work, learn, heal and live does provide meaning–it makes a fundamental difference in the way people live.”
Flex sells
Another goal for the class of 2005: They want to work to live, not live to work. “When you get good at workforce flexibility, that’s one of the things you can offer as a recruiting incentive,” Tulgan says. “The health care industry is particularly in need of new workers, and it’s become very wide practice to give nurses scheduling flexibility in exchange for working long hours.”
Enterprise’s Artim says that the company has been shifting from rewarding employees with monetary bonuses to giving more time off.
It’s not as easy for every business to offer looser schedules, though. “We’re still tweaking what our message is with flexibility,” PwC’s Van Kirk says. “In client services, when you come in as an entry-level associate, sometimes you don’t have as much control over your schedule as you do when you become a manager. We try to explain to people that the further they go, the more flexibility they’ll get.”
The other problem with talented employees on their first job is that they’ve often got an eye toward their second job–maybe because they believe that their company thinks they’re expendable. Experience’s poll found that 46 percent of this year’s graduates are planning to stay with their first employer less than two years. “The only true way to convince a worker, young or old, that loyalty is reciprocated is by demonstrating that value in your employment practices,” Chester says. “If young people see older employees being casually discarded, they know that it will be just a matter of time before the same happens to them. If they see that longevity is rewarded, they’ll feel more inclined to invest themselves fully.”
Chester notes that Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Syracuse, New York, invites young employees to recognition luncheons where longtime employees are rewarded for 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 years of service.
And Rosner says that holding on to good new employees is especially important now. With baby boomers about to retire, companies need to take proactive steps to avoid losing talented people, even those employees who are just starting their first jobs. “HR realizes that there’s a talent crunch coming up, and (the rest of) management doesn’t,” he says.
© BrainMass Inc. brainmass.com March 21, 2019, 11:31 am ad1c9bdddf
https://brainmass.com/business/business-management/44599
Solution Preview
Firstly, you said you couldn’t come up with 4 things to argue on, they can actually be, say the order of those factors mentioned in the articles? For example, it said the third most important factor in experience poll is reputation and ethics, you may actually not agree with this! You can say you actually think Salary is the third important factor?
Author said the most important factor (first one) is the learning training system of a company, and that most graduate concerns about it most – you can also said you don’t agree as well!
So its actually quite easy, but remember when you argue you need to support your argument as well, look for some real life examples, or facts, or even quote some management. That will give you a stronger argument.
I will also help you a bit with how to analyze this article, see below:
As you mentioned about questions 2, 3 and 4 however you didn’t clearly showed me which one is which question, I am assuming those three questions that I’ve highlighted in red are the ones.
I will go through one by one:
- State clearly the author’s position along with elaboration and explanation
From the article you will see that the author is to talk about the different factors …
