Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.
Intellectual Property Law Assignment 1
Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.
See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.
In an essay, please discuss the following topic:
Some academics argue that traditions and heritage should be public domain to protect them and ensure their continuity throughout the ages. Others argue that this umbrella provision is unfair and artists and authors who create derivative works inspired by heritage should get copyright protection, because this is a way of spreading awareness and is also a derivative work. Which position do you agree with? Why or why not?
Notes:
- Please make sure that you answer this question in essay
- Your answer should be typed in Times New Roman, size 12, with double spacing and justified formatting.
- Your essay should have an introduction, body and conclusion.
- The introduction should summarize your position and include a thesis statement.
- Your body should include no less than three legal arguments.
- Please note that YOU MUST CHOOSE A SIDE and support it.
- Feel free to illustrate your position using copyright law rationale, Saudi, British, and/or US law.
- The total grade allotted for this assignment is 10 points. You will be graded according to the rubric on page 2.
| Quality | Strongest
(2 points) |
Adequate
(1 point) |
Weakest
(0 points) |
| FOCUS/ UNITY
|
Paper is focused and doesn’t go off on tangents
Makes a point |
Paper is mostly focused and does not go off on tangents
Attempts to make a point |
Paper is not focused and goes off on tangents
Point uncertain |
| DEVELOPMENT/
INFORMATION |
Includes rich supporting details
Avoids redundancy Addresses the best arguments of the refutation |
Some supporting details
Some repetition of story components Addresses some of the best arguments of the refutation |
Few or irrelevant supporting details
Redundancy Addresses few or none of the best arguments of the refutation |
| STRUCTURE | Follows through on thesis
The reader does not get confused |
Mainly follows through on the thesis
The reader occasionally gets confused |
Does not follow through on the thesis
The reader is generally confused |
| DEPTH | Displays insight
Demonstrates significant reflection & awareness Establishes significant connection to wider world |
Surface understanding
Some reflection & awareness Some reference to wider world |
Minimal or no reflection or insight
Limited connection wider world |
| WORD CHOICE | Precise terms
Avoids clichés Varied words No verb tense or sentence agreement problems |
Some imprecision
Some clichés Some repetition of words Some verb tense or sentence agreement problems |
Imprecise language
Many clichés Much repetition of words Repetitive Many verb tense and sentence agreement problems |
Intellectual Property Law Assignment 1
