Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.
Decision-Making Table
Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.
See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.
For this assignment, you will apply analytical reasoning and identify strategies for self-assessment to reconsider your decision-making patterns. You will need to complete a table with four columns to complete this task.
In the first column, you will provide two personal examples where you acted in accordance with one or more of the patterns of irrational or unethical decision-making.
In the second column, you will identify which pattern(s) of irrational or unethical decision-making applies to your situations.
In the third column, you will identify any characteristics of egocentrism or sociocentrism, as well as any pathological tendencies of mind, involved in your thought process.
Finally, in the fourth column, share how you could have applied the keys to sound decision-making to approach the situation more rationally.
Unit VI Assignment Decision-Making Table
Name:
| Personal Examples | Pattern(s) | Characteristics | Keys to Sound Decision-Making |
| Provide two personal examples where you acted in accordance with one or more of the patterns of irrational or unethical decision-making. | Identify which pattern(s) of irrational or unethical decision-making applies to your situations. | Identify any characteristics of egocentrism or sociocentrism, as well as any pathological tendencies of mind, involved in your thought process. | Share how you could have applied the keys to sound decision-making to approach the situation more rationally. |
| Begin here |
Grid View List View
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Content
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 23 (23%) Content is often irrelevant; information may be noticeably incorrect and/or off-topic.
Points Range: 24 (24%) – 27 (27%) Content is somewhat relevant and informative; may stray off topic a few times.
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Content is mostly relevant and informative; may stray off topic one or two times.
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) Content is relevant and informative; may stray slightly off topic one time.
Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%) Content is highly relevant and informative; remains on topic.
Tasks
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The assigned tasks may be mostly incomplete or poorly done.
Points Range: 21 (21%) – 24 (24%) A few areas of the assigned tasks may be missing; completed tasks may need work.
Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) Some areas of the assigned tasks may be missing or incomplete; completed tasks are fairly well done.
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) Most or all areas of the assigned tasks are addressed and competently completed.
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) All areas of the assigned tasks are addressed and proficiently completed.
Accuracy
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 8 (8%) Most of the assignment is clearly inaccurate and lacks attention to detail.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Several areas of the assignment may be slightly lacking in accuracy and/or attention to detail.
Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) Most of the assignment is fairly accurate and shows fair attention to detail.
Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Most of the assignment is accurate and shows good attention to detail.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Accuracy is excellent and close attention to detail is clearly evident in all parts of the assignment.
Writing Mechanics
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 5 (5%) Writing lacks clarity and conciseness. May have several serious problems with sentence structure and grammar. Numerous major or minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling. General requirements are not met at all.
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Writing lacks clarity and/or conciseness. May have minor problems with sentence structure and some grammatical errors, as well as several minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling. General requirements of the assignment are slightly met.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) Writing is somewhat clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are fairly strong and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling. General requirements of the assignment are somewhat met.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) Writing is mostly clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are strong and mostly correct. Few minor errors in punctuation and/or spelling. General requirements of the assignment are mostly met.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) Writing is clear and concise. Sentence structure and grammar are excellent. Correct use of punctuation. No spelling errors. General requirements of the assignment are met.
