Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.
Educating Staff: Implementing Change PowerPoint Guidelines and Grading Rubric
Verify your essay before you submit. Get an Official Turnitin Report for Just $8.99!
Check your paper with the same Turnitin report your professor uses. AI detection + similarity score without storing your work. Pay once, no subscription
Check My Assignment!Purpose
The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to create the Educating Staff: Implementing Change Project PowerPoint presentation. Your plan is to educate the staff that will be involved in the pilot program. You will need to educate them on the problem, show the supporting evidence, and how your pilot plan will be implemented.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2)
CO3: Communicates effectively with patient populations and other healthcare providers in managing the healthcare of individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO #3)
CO7: Integrates the professional role of leader, teacher, communicator, and manager of care to plan cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings. (PO #7)
Due Date
Milestone #3 consists of the PowerPoint presentation Educating Staff: Implementing Change Project. Submit this Milestone to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 6.
Points
Milestone #3 is worth 200 points.
Directions
- Create an educational presentation for staff before the launch of your change project. This should inform the staff of the problem, your potential solution, and their role in change project.
- The format for this proposal will be a PowerPoint presentation.
- The length of the PowerPoint presentation should be 15-20 slides; excluding the title and reference slides.
- Below are the topics for the slides:
- Title slide
- Description of the change model used
- PICO question—include the elements
- Scope of the problem—use statistics
- Your team/stakeholders
- Evidence to support your need for change—from research
- Action Plan
- Timeline for the plan
- The nurses role and responsibility in the pilot program
- Procedure
- Forms that will be used (if applicable)
- Resources available to the staff—including yourself
- Summary
- References
- Citations and References must be included to support the information within each topic area. Refer to the APA manual, Chapter 7, for examples of proper reference format. Citations are to be noted for all information contained in your paper that is not your original idea or thought. Ask yourself, “How do I know this?” and then cite the source. Scholarly sources are expected, which means choose peer-reviewed journals and credible websites.
Guidelines
- Application: Use Microsoft PowerPoint 2010.
- Length: The PowerPoint slide show is expected to be between 15-20 slides in length (not including the title slide and reference list slide).
- Submission: Submit your files via the basket in the Dropbox: “Educating the Staff: Implementing the Change Project” by 11:59 p.m. Sunday of Week 6.
- Late Submission: See the course policy on late submissions.
- Tutorial: For those not familiar with the development of a PowerPoint slideshow, the following link to the Microsoft website may be helpful. The Chamberlain Student Success Strategies (CCSSS) offers a module on Computer Literacy that contains a section on PowerPoint. The link to SSP CCSSS may be found under the Special Courses list in eCollege.
Best Practices in Preparing a PowerPoint Presentation
The following are best practices in preparing this project.
- Slides should be easy to read with short bullet points and large font. Do not use paragraphs.
- Be creative, but realistic with your intervention and evaluation tool.
- Incorporate graphics, clip art, or photographs to increase interest.
- Review directions thoroughly.
- Cite all sources within the slide show with in-text citations, as well as a reference page.
- Proofread prior to final submission.
- Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
- Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing academic integrity policy.
Grading Criteria: Educating Staff: Implementing Change
| Category | Points | % | Description |
| The Problem | 30 | 15% | Summary of change model discussed. PICO question including elements. Scope of the problem includes statistics and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen. |
| The Evidence | 35 | 17% | Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but synthesized into concepts discovered. At least four sources used (at least three peer reviews and the other a credible resource). |
| The Plan | 35 | 17% | Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical. Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate. |
| The Nurse’s Role | 25 | 13% | The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear. Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise. |
| Resources | 20 | 10% | Form for tracking the outcomes is included. Resources the nurses will need are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included. |
| Summary | 10 | 5% | Summary slide reiterates the problem and purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals. |
| Overall Presentation | 20 | 10% | Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read. |
| Mechanics | 25 | 13% | Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References are properly cited within the paper. Reference page includes all citations. Evidence of spell and grammar check. |
| Total | 200 points | 100% |
Grading Rubric: Educating the staff Milestone #3
| Assignment Criteria | A (100%)
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
B (88%)
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance |
C (80%)
Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
NI (38%)
Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance |
F (0%)
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance |
| The Problem
30 points |
* Summary of change model discussed
(1 slide) * PICO question including elements (1 slide) * Scope of the problem includes statistics and scope of problem to healthcare as a whole discussed. (1-2 slides) * Team and stakeholders and their role/reason chosen (1 slide) 30 points ☐ |
One of the four elements was not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.
26 points ☐ |
Two of the four elements were not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.
24 points ☐ |
Three of the four elements were not thorough or did not include all appropriate elements.
11 points ☐ |
None of the elements were thorough and had inappropriate elements.
0 points ☐ |
| The Evidence
35 points |
Discussion of the evidence is done in terms of themes. Pertinent information is summarized. Sources are not listed individually but synthesized into concepts. At least four sources used (at least three peer reviews and the other is a credible resource).
(3–4 slides) 35 points ☐ |
Four sources are discussed but evidence is not synthesized into themes learned.
31 points ☐ |
Four sources are discussed but evidence is not synthesized or summarized.
28 points ☐ |
Only two to three sources are discussed, and are not synthesized or summarized.
13 points ☐ |
Only one source, or no source, is mentioned. Nothing is synthesized.
0 points ☐ |
| The Plan
35 points |
* Plan of action described. Important elements are discussed and logical.
(1-2 slide) * Timeline is thorough and contains all elements. Timeline is logical and appropriate. (1 slide) 35 points ☐ |
* Plan of action described but not all important elements included. OR
* Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements. 31 points ☐ |
* Plan of action described but not all important elements included. AND
* Timeline is present but doesn’t contain all elements. 28 points ☐ |
Plan of action is present but not logical and is incomplete.
The timeline is not appropriate or logical. 13 points ☐ |
Plan of action is not present.
The timeline is not present. 0 points ☐ |
| The Nurse’s Role
25 points |
* The nurse’s role in the pilot plan is described and clear.
(1 slide) * Procedures for the pilot plan are clear and concise. (2-3 slides) 25 points ☐ |
* The nurses’ role is described but not clear.
OR * Procedures are discussed but not clear. 22 points ☐ |
* The nurses’ role is described but not clear.
AND * Procedures are discussed but not clear. 20 points ☐ |
The nurse’s roles are not appropriate. Procedures are not clearly written and are incomplete.
10 points ☐ |
Nurses’ roles are absent. Procedures are absent.
0 points ☐ |
| Resources
20 points |
* Form for tracking the outcomes is included.
(1 slide) * Resources the nurses will need are included. At least three resources are included. The nurse investigator, the team, internet resources, or other resources the staff needs is included. (1 slide) 20 points ☐ |
* Form for tracking outcomes included.
*At least three resources are included but the resources were not the best available resources. 18 points ☐ |
* Form for tracking outcomes included but are not well-developed.
*At least three resources are included but the resources are not the best available resources. 16 points ☐ |
Form for tracking outcomes is poorly developed.
Only one or two helpful resources are given. 8 points ☐ |
* Form for tracking outcomes is absent.
* No appropriate or helpful resources are given. 0 points ☐ |
| Summary
10 points |
Summary slide reiterates the problem AND purpose of the plan along with the measurable goals.
(1-2 slides) 10 points ☐ |
Summary slide reiterates the problem AND purpose.
Goals are stated but are not measurable. 9 points ☐ |
The Summary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both.
Goals are stated but are not measurable. 8 points ☐ |
The Summary slide reiterates the problem OR the purpose, but not both. Goals are not mentioned.
4 points ☐ |
Summary slide is not shown.
0 points ☐ |
| Overall presentation
20 points |
Presentation is presented in a clear and logical manner. PowerPoint is appealing to the eye and includes creativity. Font is easy to read.
20 points ☐ |
Presentation is accurate and covers most elements.
18 points ☐ |
Presentation content is accurate and can be followed, but it lacks flow and creativity.
16 points ☐ |
Presentation lacks flow and creativity or is difficult to follow.
8 points ☐ |
Presentation lacks any attempt at organization and comes across as chaotic.
0 points ☐ |
| Mechanics
25 points |
Includes title slide. Grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. References properly cited within the paper.
Reference page includes all citations. Evidence of spell and grammar check. 25 points ☐ |
Title slide is incomplete.
Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, and/or sentence structure noted. Citations are present but not correct format. References are present, with minimal errors in format. 22 points ☐ |
Missing title slide
Multiple grammar and punctuation errors noted. 20 points ☐ |
The title slide is missing. The references are improperly formatted and are incomplete. Errors in spelling and grammar are evident.
10 points ☐ |
Title slide and citations are missing.
References are missing. No evidence of proof-reading prior to submitting assignment. 0 points ☐ |
| Total Points Possible = 200 points | |||||
Implementing Change PowerPoint Guidelines and Grading Rubric
