Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.
Compare and contrast the terms of reference of the Wallis Inquiry and the recently
announced Financial System Inquiry. Consider the economic, regulatory and global context
that these inquiries were/will be undertaken in.
Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.
See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.
- Comment on the recommendations made by the Wallis Inquiry and their impact on the
current financial services regulatory environment.
Note:
- You can access the terms of reference for the Financial System Inquiry and the full Wallis
report from www.fsi.treasury.gov.au - You will need to do some independent research in relation to what has been implemented
from the Wallis report. Given the word limit focus on substantial aspects only.
Learning Outcomes:
- Develop an understanding of the current financial services regulatory environment
- Develop an understanding as to how substantial inquiries into sectors result in changes to
legislation - Broaden knowledge in relation to financial products and financial markets
- Broaden knowledge in relation to the function of regulatory bodies.
Presentation:
Word count: 2000 words excluding bibliography but inclusive of any in-text reference with a 10%
tolerance, anything over this will not be marked. You are expected to read widely and at least 6
reference sources should be noted. There is a wealth of information on the Wallis inquiry, you will
not struggle to find relevant information but ensure that it is from a credible source.
Referencing: For this essay please use Chicago referencing style – a guide is available via the library if
you are not familiar with this style. Please note – no referencing, no marks (see comments on
Turnitin below)
Allow a 5cm margin on the right hand side of page for comments, at least 12 pt font to be used.
It is recommended that you include an abstract to guide the reader at the outset. Use of
appropriate headings is encouraged.
: Financial System Inquiry
Topic:
In December 2013, the Government announced the terms of reference for the Financial System Inquiry. It has been 16 years since the last substantial review of this sector, the outcome being the Wallis Report. Your task is to write a critical essay; that responds to the following: 1. Compare and contrast the terms of reference of the Wallis Inquiry and the recently announced Financial System Inquiry. Consider the economic, regulatory and global context that these inquiries were/will be undertaken in. 2. Comment on the recommendations made by the Wallis Inquiry and their impact on the current financial services regulatory environment. Note: 1. You can access the terms of reference for the Financial System Inquiry and the full Wallis report from www.fsi.treasury.gov.au 2. You will need to do some independent research in relation to what has been implemented from the Wallis report. Given the word limit focus on substantial aspects only.
Learning Outcomes:
- Develop an understanding of the current financial services regulatory environment 2. Develop an understanding as to how substantial inquiries into sectors result in changes to legislation 3. Broaden knowledge in relation to financial products and financial markets 4. Broaden knowledge in relation to the function of regulatory bodies.
Presentation:
Word count: 2000 words excluding bibliography but inclusive of any in-text reference with a 10% tolerance, anything over this will not be marked. You are expected to read widely and at least 6 reference sources should be noted. There is a wealth of information on the Wallis inquiry, you will not struggle to find relevant information but ensure that it is from a credible source. Referencing: For this essay please use Chicago referencing style – a guide is available via the library if you are not familiar with this style. Please note – no referencing, no marks (see comments on Turnitin below) Allow a 5cm margin on the right hand side of page for comments, at least 12 pt font to be used. It is recommended that you include an abstract to guide the reader at the outset. appropriate headings is encouraged. Use of
