Order ready-to-submit essays. No Plagiarism Guarantee!
Note: All our papers are written from scratch by human writers to ensure authenticity and originality.
Respond to two or more of your colleagues’ postings by critiquing their draft Problem Statements as follows:
Verify your essay before you submit. Get an Official Turnitin Report for Just $8.99!
Check your paper with the same Turnitin report your professor uses. AI detection + similarity score without storing your work. Pay once, no subscription
Check My Assignment!· Provide suggestions for revision to the quantitative Problem Statement, supporting your suggestions with references to the Doctoral Study Rubric and Research Handbook.
· Provide suggestions for revision to the qualitative Problem Statement, supporting your suggestions with references to the Doctoral Study Rubric and Research Handbook.
Greg
Qualitative Problem Statement
The continued viability of the U.S. commercial nuclear industry is dependent upon control of construction and operating costs (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018). Market pressure from low-cost natural gas generation and slow growth demand have resulted in the planned closure, by 2025, of 25% of the operating nuclear power reactors in the United States (Nuclear Energy Institute, 2018). The general business problem is escalating operating and construction costs are leading to the premature closure of commercial nuclear power reactors, resulting in lost revenue and increased fossil fuel consumption, contributing to the effects of climate change and environmental pollution. The specific business problem is the inability of some nuclear leadership to manage the business aspect of power plant operations respective of the operational risks associated with nuclear power.
Quantitative Problem Statement
The continued viability of the U.S. commercial nuclear industry is dependent upon control of construction and operating costs (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018). Market pressure from low-cost natural gas generation and slow growth demand have resulted in the planned closure, by 2025, of 25% of the operating nuclear power reactors in the United States (Nuclear Energy Institute, 2018). The general business problem is escalating operating and construction costs are leading to the premature closure of commercial nuclear power reactors, resulting in lost revenue and increased fossil fuel consumption, contributing to the effects of climate change and environmental pollution. The specific business problem is the inability of some nuclear leadership to manage the relationship between (a) capital expense, (b) operating & maintenance expense, (c) construction expense, (d) regulatory expense, and the perceived operational risks associated with nuclear power.
References
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2018). The future of nuclear energy in a carbon-constrained world. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from https://energy.mit.edu
Nuclear Energy Institute. (2018). Nuclear costs in context. Washington: Nuclear Energy Institute. Retrieved from https://www.nei.org
Dustin
I want to preference my posting, with, I was a mixed method coming into this course, so there is a slight difference between my two problem statements.
Quantitative Problem Statement:
Business-focused university departments are accountable for developing students into responsible business managers, which are prepared to manage companies in the future in an ethical context (Iordache-Platis, 2017). There are currently 4,627 higher educational institutions across the United States, with an enrollment of 2.1-million business students collectively; institutional business professors are leading these students, with a variety of leadership styles (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, 2018). The general business problem is the development of students into responsible business managers. The specific business problem is understanding the relationship between average class size, major, degree, completion duration, and business manager development (Van Auken, 2016).
Qualitative Problem Statement:
Business-focused university departments are accountable for developing students into responsible business managers, which are prepared to manage companies in the future in an ethical context (Iordache-Platis, 2017). There are currently 4,627 higher educational institutions across the United States, with an enrollment of 2.1-million business students collectively; institutional business professors are leading these students, with a variety of leadership styles (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, 2018). The general business problem is the development of students into responsible business managers. The specific business problem is some higher education business professors do not have a strategy for guiding students into becoming responsible and ethical business managers (Romious, Thompson, and Thompson, 2016).
References
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2018). Business school data guide 2018. Tampa, FL: Author.
Iordache-Platis, M. (2017). Strategies for academic leadership towards increasing productivity in higher education institutions; business education case. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 11(1), pp 255-263. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0027
Romious, T. S., Thompson, R., & Thompson, E. (2016). Ethics training and workplace ethical decisions of MBA professionals. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(1), pp 190–198. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ1097790&site=eds-live&scope=site
Van Auken, S. (2016). Assessing the role of business faculty values and background in the recognition of an ethical dilemma. Journal of Education for Business, 91(4), pp 211–218. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1080/08832323.2016.1160021
